Public facts · Updated 22 September 2026
Urticad and Miharana: public facts and availability
A dated, conservative reference for search engines, AI answer systems, partners, artists and galleries.
Direct answer
Urticad Tech Limited is a UK software company working in Digital Technology, with a research focus on AI for digital art. Miharana is its independent digital-art platform.
Miharana is being built to connect artwork files with provenance evidence, creator authority, authorised renditions, lifecycle events, proportionate public verification and evidence-linked watermarking. These are not all generally available services today.
Availability
Live now
Public company and research record
Urticad’s company site, Journal, product information and dated research articles are publicly available. The Miharana product surface at miharana.com is live.
Public product routes
Gallery, Verify and seller enquiries
Explore the public gallery and available provenance lookup. Seller submissions are being prepared; use the existing enquiry route.
Being built
Evidence and lifecycle workflows
Broader provenance records, authorised renditions, lifecycle events, proportionate public verification, evidence-linked watermarking and fiat-first commerce remain staged product work.
Not claimed
No guarantees or invented recognition
Urticad does not claim that invisible watermarking alone is proof, that copying can be prevented, that institutions have adopted Miharana, or that search and AI systems will cite it.
How the evidence model is intended to work
Provenance is evidence; permission is separate
A provenance record can document a file, creator assertion, source disclosure, approved rendition or intervention. A licence, deed or applicable agreement defines permission and rights. One does not replace the other.
Watermarks should lead to evidence
An invisible watermark can act as a resilient pointer, but invisible watermarking alone is not proof. Useful verification also needs signed records, stable identifiers, status, revocation and human-readable context.
Public verification should be proportionate
A public result should reveal enough evidence to support a decision while avoiding unnecessary exposure of master files, private identity data or security-sensitive details.